Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team

Wikipedia 1.0 — (talk) FAQ — To do
Release version tools Guide — (talk) — (stats)
Article selection process (talk) Version 0.8 bot selection Version 0.8 feedback
IRC channel (IRC)
Release criteria
Review team (FAQ)
Version 0.8 release (manual selection) (t)
"Selection" project (Talk) schools selection Offline WP for Indian Schools
CORE TOPICS CORE SUPPLEMENT Core topics - 1,000 (Talk) (COTF) (bot)
TORRENT (Talk)
"Selection" project for kids ((t))
WORK VIA WIKI PROJECTS (talk)
Pushing to 1.0 (talk)
Static content subcom.

If you are new to this page, please see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/FAQs.

Core topics discussions – Wiki sort discussions – FAs first discussions – Work via WikiProjects discussions – Pushing to 1.0 discussions

Archives

• Archive 1 · Objections archive
• Archive 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 (Sep - Dec 2005)
• Archive 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 (Jan - May 2006)
• Archive 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 ( - Oct 2006)
• Archive 14 ( - Mar 2007) 15 ( - Dec 2007) 16 ( - Jan 2009) 17 ( - Feb 2010)
• Archive 18 ( - Oct 2011) 19 ( - Dec 2015) 20 (Jan 2016 - )

Antarctica

I have nominated Antarctica for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Request for Feedback from Editorial Team

Hello, I am part of a team at a University where we are building a LLM style model which will be given a topic and will generate different subtopics and then text in order to write an informative article. We are going to be using several different types of scoring mechanisms, but we would ideally like to have frequent wikipedia editors collaborate with scoring the articles. Please message me if interested in working on a fascinating project pushing the envelope of State of the Art technology. Terribilis11 (talk) 00:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

@Terribilis11, have you read Wikipedia:Large language models and related pages? WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

A printworthy notice

Altering rcat status of Drawfee to printworthy. It currently redirects to College Humor, which is an outdated connection and Drawfee meets the criteria for inclusion on their own. Giving notice here as per Template:R printworthy. A new full article to be posted soon. JimsMaher (talk) 23:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia CD Selection has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedia CD Selection has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Schierbecker (talk) 03:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Current status of Wikipedia 1.0

What is the current status of this project? I see a lot of pages in this project seem fairly outdated. It seems like it was still somewhat active as of 2021. Mathwriter2718 (talk) 17:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

I've been thinking it's well passed time to mark this page as historical. Any objections? Schierbecker (talk)

• Support marking as historical. C F A 💬 03:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

  Walkerma, is this work still being organized mostly off wiki? If so, then it might help to update the page to say that, so that people don't see the inactivity here and assume that it means inactivity everywhere. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

@WhatamIdoing:, @Mathwriter2718:: Sorry I missed this - for some reason my alerts didn't show this post until today. Yes - the work is mostly going on offline, but is active - in fact I had a 45 minute video call just today about it. A lot of updates were done to the bot over the past few months. I have been wanting to update this page for a while, but my work IRL has taken precedence; I'm head of a department and I've seen several colleagues lose their jobs in recent months so my focus is obviously on protecting those that remain. If you and/or others would be willing to work with me to get the pages updated I'd be thrilled. We have a lot to update and talk about, but just my life in meatspace keeps getting in the way. Can anyone help out? Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 00:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

@Walkerma, I don't really know enough to update the page. The most important thing is probably to help people understand how to join in. If someone wanted, e.g., to join a general meeting, how would they find out about it? WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks - that's a useful perspective. I will try to find the time to do what I can! I did do some updates a few months back to remove defunct projects, but I need to finish the job. Walkerma (talk) 05:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

@Walkerma — agreed w/ @WhatamIdoing: if one of the recurring jobs / scripts / cron jobs updated a status page (similar to how the backup scripts are constantly putting out an update whenever a minor language-edition snapshot is made) that would help visualize the work. And we should have a backlog category for pages that have never been assessed. (future work: Then a way to tag pages that have change substantively since the last eval...) Warmly, – SJ + 02:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

@Sj, @Nettrom has a script for identifying pages whose ORES score differs from the rated score. I suggest looking primarily at articles that are off by two classes (e.g., ORES says C, we say Stub), as the difference between a "big Stub" and a "small Start" is something people disagree about. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:08, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

PS the new interest in offline reaeers (via kiwix ant IIAB) should drive some additional interest in contributing to a 1.0 push. – SJ + 02:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

@SJ - Yes, that would be very helpful. I have some free time again after Christmas so I will bear that in mind as I do more updates. Do you know how to set up an auto-update of this sort? If so, could you (or someone you recommend) get it set up on here for WP1? All the best for the holidays, Walkerma (talk) 04:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

The WD and abstract WP team are very methodical about it, you might try asking Denny or JamesF what tools they use to post small regular updates. But an API call to add a ==YYYY-MM Updates== section to this talk page would be easy enough. Looking for an existing one to append to it would be a bit harder, but instead you could just append to subpage /YYYY-MM and transclude it once on this talk. – SJ + 23:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC)